The Proven Truth

TO CONTACT OR CONTRIUTE, CLICK HERE

Irrefutable proof of the existence of a Supreme Being

            Let's imagine that you are an archeologist.  You have dug down to rock.  Within this bedrock you see something that looks like it might be the top of something man made.  You wonder, how could this be?  This bedrock was formed millions of years ago. 

            So you and your team manage to chip away the rock to reveal a small box with ornate markings on it.  You open the box, and inside there is a small golden plate.  On the golden plate, in English, you read:  "In the year you call 1963 a president of a nation you call the United States of America who is named Kennedy will be assassinated while riding down a street in what you call an automobile." 

            What would this tell you?  One of three things.  You could be dreaming.  Or, you could have found the result of an expertly concocted hoax.  Or, lastly, this could be the legitimate evidence of someone who lived millions of years ago who had received information regarding the future; who wrote it down; and who buried the box containing this written information into what was then dirt, which later became rock.

            Several days pass and you realize you were not dreaming.  Scratch the first possibility.

            You bring in a panel of experts who inspect the bedrock and the site, do all kinds of tests, and determine that no way could this be a hoax.  Scratch the second possibility.

            It must be the real thing.

            Newscasters gather around you.  Your news is in all the media.  The tabloids have all offered you millions for your scoop.

            Then some pranksters come forward.  They show how they faked the whole thing.  They redo the procedure and invite scientists to come in and investigate.  These scientists do all the same tests, and conclude that, by golly, yes this was how it was done.  The world is both amazed and disappointed.  It was a fake after all.

            But neither you nor the world could be blamed for believing you had real proof, because you had done everything scientifically known to prove or disprove; and all scientific evidence available to man for proving or disproving  proclaimed your artifact genuine.

            What I am saying is that the best physical evidence can be faked given enough genius, resources, and motive.  Any proof based on the three dimensions of length, width, and height can be questioned, and can possibly be inconclusive.  So when we are talking about physical proof involving the three dimensions we are talking about potentially inconclusive proof.

            There is one more dimension to this physical world however.  The forth dimension of time.  One might argue that the evidence of the box and the revelation you found involved time as well.  No it did not.  It appeared to involve time.  The box had not been there for millions of years, but it appeared to have been.  In the case of your box, there was the possibility that the appearance of the factor of time being involved could have been faked.  If not, there would have been no need to test the site and the box by all the scientists in the first place.

            The only time involved in your archeological discovery that could count as proof time began the moment you made the discovery.  Until you made this discovery, insofar as the actual test of time was concerned, the apparent millions of years had come and gone without witnesses.  The public witnessing of your discovery only began when you found the artifact.  If that was only three months ago, then the actual proof of the test of time was only three months, not millions of years.

            In order for time to be involved in a proof, the world needs to have the proof in front of them for the duration of the span of time required for proof to be legitimate.

      Suppose, for example, the chunk of rock in which you made your discovery had not been untouched, but had in fact been in a museum since the days of Napoleon's rape of the Egyptian artifact world.  Suppose that instead of being in the ground unfound until three months ago, your box had been encased in the obelisk standing in St. Peter's Square, which the Catholic church took from Egypt with many thousands of witnesses, and is a matter of historic record.  The world knows the obelisk is ancient, and not adulterated by tricksters (except for the Catholic church of course). 

            So when your box was pulled out of the obelisk three months ago, the need for genuine testing to date the box was simply for the record, to date the age of the box, but not for proof.  The proof is that the box has been in public view and knowledge inside the obelisk for hundreds of years at St. Peter's Square; and thousands of years prior to St. Peter's Square, when the obelisk was in Egypt.  Such a proof is unquestionable insofar as the time of exposed existence is a matter of accurate public knowledge and record.  And since the pranksters would not have had the technology at that early a date, the earliest date of public knowledge and record of the obelisk, it would have been impossible for the pranksters to travel back in time, to a date prior to the public exposure of the obelisk, to effect the scam; much less travel forward in time to the present in order to reveal their trick.

            Can we, with our present technology, make such travels through time?  Some people believe that the so-called "Philadelphia experiment" caused the ship to do just that.  Maybe it happened.  Maybe at some top secret level we are harboring a time travel machine.

            Maybe Elvis is still alive and living with aliens. 

            I'm sorry, but while theoretically the possibility exists, the evidence says otherwise.   (As for Elvis?  My mother was a personal friend to Elvis' undertaker.  Elvis is dead.)

            Einstein's theories allow for forward time travel.  It's one way only.  It consists of traveling at speeds approaching the speed of light.  At such a speed, time for you slows down relative to the time for the rest of the universe.  This means that Elijah, for example, who was taken off the earth thousands of years ago, traveling at near the speed of light all these thousands of years by our reckoning; has, by his reckoning, only been traveling a few years or even months perhaps.  When he returns, he will only be just a little older, even though he has been gone from earth for thousands of years.  For him, he has traveled forward in time.

            However, insofar as we know, traveling into the past is not possible.  Yes, there are aspects of Einstein's theories that will allow reverse time travel if certain laws of physics can be overcome.  For example, the theory is that it is possible to "slingshot" around a black hole and theoretically surpass the speed of light on the condition that the relative speed-of-light limit can be breeched.  And then there's the wormhole theory, which basically allows you to punch a hole in space and move apparent thousands of light years in four-dimensional space without going through the actual space.  This isn't really time travel, just a way of cheating relative speed-of-light limit by not passing through the actual space in which this limit exists.

            However, an H.G. Wells time machine, where you pull a lever backward and proceed backward in time is not, with our science and technology, possible.  Not yet anyway.  Is it possible?  One is a fool to say that anything is impossible.  However, within all known parameters of our existence thus far, humanity has not yet achieved the science nor the technology to travel back and forth in time.  Time is, for us, as close to an absolute constant as anything can be.

            This is why when the Isaiah prophets put the words of our Covenanter into their writings for the specific purpose of giving proof to us in our day of advanced physics and knowledge, it was put into the Isaiah prophecies well over two thousand years ago; and placed into public record as early as the first known publications of the books of Isaiah, well over a millennium ago at the latest.  All this time, this evidence has been in front of the public, a matter of public record, in scripture sets all over the world. 

            Thus for this evidence to be a scam, the perpetuator would have to have traveled back in time to before the Isaiah prophets' writings became known publicly; manufacture the prophetic evidence in such a way that it would appear to be authentic Isaiah prophecy; and then return to our time to point out the "proof".  And since I am the only one pointing out this proof, and certainly the first to point it out since the Isaiah prophets' writings became public, then the perpetuator would have to be me, and me alone.  Until I made this proof public for the first time in the late 1990's c.e. no one had ever made this knowledge available; and probably, no one had ever even seen it.

            What is this "evidence" of which I speak?  I will give you one example, although there are many examples.  This particular example is somewhat unique because it contains dates.  No, not numerical dates, but rather these dates are presented by way of signposts in history.  Of course, such signposts are only provided when the prophecy is to be understood after these historical signposts have occurred.  Until these signposts have occurred in history, the understanding of such a prophecy is always flawed because the signposts haven't happened yet.  It's like someone giving you directions which say to "turn right at the gray building" so you keep looking for a gray building, only the building hasn't yet been built.

            This particular set of evidence is found in Isaiah 45.  I suggest that if you want to see this even more clearly, visit my Isaiah 45 commentary.  For this evidence I will only point out the major portions since you can go visit the commentary and see all the details there.

            In verse 12 our Covenanter states,

I have made the earth, and created man upon it: I, even my hands, have stretched out the heavens, and all their host have I commanded.   (Isaiah 45:12, my italics)

            Religion has tried through the centuries to compete with science on several points regarding nature, the creation, etc.  When science came out with the "big bang" theory that the universe began as a singularity expanding out to become the universe, religion was adamantly against the theory.  Then in the late 1950's c.e. two Bell Labs engineers discovered the evidence that the big bang was indeed the way the universe came into being.  The universe was literally stretched out from the singularity; and in fact the light from the stretching out of this singularity is still coming to us today.          

            This statement that the Supreme Being stretched out the universe is not unique to this prophecy.  It is found in several prophecies, all of them intended to be understood only after the knowledge of the big bang would have been established.  In other words, only after the late 1950's c.e.  Previous to this time, the true understanding of these prophecies could not have been accurately understood.  The signposts had not been established.

            In verse 14, we see another signpost that established the date of the beginning of an event:

Thus saith the LORD, The labour of Egypt, and merchandise of Ethiopia and of the Sabeans, men of stature, shall come over unto thee, and they shall be thine: they shall come after thee… (Isaiah 45:14, my italics)

            Until Israel was defeated by the Romans around 70 c.e. this event had not yet occurred.  Read this in context and you will see that the events described in the context never occurred in the history of Israel prior to 70 c.e.  Since 70 c.e. Israel has not been a recognized extant political entity until 1948 c.e.  In order for anyone to "come over unto" Israel, Israel had to become a politically recognized entity.

            Also notice that this event of these men coming over to Israel had to occur after Israel had, itself, returned; for these men of stature, the verse tells us, "…shall come after thee…" or in other words, after Israel had returned to the land.  If you have never left your home, you cannot come back to it because you are still there.  First Israel had to return to the land; then these men would come over after Israel.  This dictates that at no time prior to 1948 c.e. could this signpost have been established.

            Now we come to verse 21, which is as clear a statement of irrefutable proof, if you will just think about it, that you will find anywhere.

Tell ye, and bring them near; yea, let them take counsel together: who hath declared this from ancient time? who hath told it from that time? have not I the LORD? and there is no God else beside me; a just God and a Saviour; there is none beside me.   (Isaiah 45:21, my italics)

            Of the many prophetic statements made in this chapter, the two I have given involve special cases.  The first was the revelation to the Isaiah prophets by our Covenanter, the Supreme Being, of the true nature of creation, the big bang.  The Isaiah prophets did not have radio telescopes, nor did they have sophisticated detection equipment, nor did they have computers, nor did they have the astronomical and quantum physics sciences to aid them in making this discovery about the creation of the universe. 

            What they did have was someone who knew how it was done, and told the Isaiah prophets how it was done over twenty-five centuries before the Bell Labs people discovered it.

            The second prophetic statement I have chosen to give to you here is the prophetic statement about the resettlement of Israel and re-establishment of Israel as a politically recognized nation; and the subsequent infiltration of the Christian missionary movements into Israel (see the Isaiah 45 commentary). 

            These and many more prophetic statements were given in Isaiah 45, and have all occurred by the present day.  All these signposts are present, with the exception of the few which are yet to come.  And the proof that they are given by the Supreme Being, and not the figment of hairy, dirty, crazy old men eating mushrooms is the test question given by our Covenanter Himself:  "Who declared all this from what for you is an ancient time?  Who told it 2,500+ years ago?  It was Me, the One Abraham worshipped, the Supreme Being." 

            Had the books of Isaiah been hidden away in some ancient temple or crypt, and had these books come to light only now, they would not be absolute proof that they are valid.  Why not?  Because the only time involved where these records would have been known publicly would be very short, long after the signposts had been already established.

            But because the Isaiah prophets' writings have been a matter of very public record for many, many hundreds of years; because they were a matter of public record long before Israel was re-established as a nation, long before the world had the capability to find the evidence in the universe that proves the big bang to be the way the universe was created; the Isaiah prophecies have the forth and only indisputable proving factor of time to validate them.  We cannot dispute that the record of Isaiah 45 has been before us since antiquity.  We cannot dispute what these words have prophesied.  We cannot dispute that these prophecies give us signposts which did not exist or were impossible to find previous to no earlier than the late 1950's c.e.  Somebody who knew not only the way the universe was created, but also knew of Israel's (then) future dispersal and later revalidation as a political entity. 

            And what's more, the prophecy contains the declaration that our Covenanter gave these anciently.  These prophecies were thus meant for a time when the Isaiah record was an ancient record.  Not an old record, but an ancient record.  A time when not only were the Isaiah records ancient, but a time in which proof of the big bang was a reality; and a time when Israel had be reinstated as a political nation.

            Such a prophecy indisputably establishes that those who knew these things had to learn them from someone who had the knowledge.  The Isaiah prophets declare that this someone was the Supreme Being.  The mathematical probabilities that all this information could have been gotten accurately by chance are incalculable because the possible prophecies that could have been given, if the prophets were merely guessing, are pragmatically infinite.  To even get one of the prophecies correct would have been incalculable.  To get all of them correct, well…

            The prophecies in Isaiah 45 prove the existence of a Supreme Being.   They prove that someone knew all this information over 2,500 years ago.  Anyone who could know all this information over 2,500 years ago had to be a supreme being.   He had to be someone who knew how the universe was created, and possessed completely accurate knowledge of the events to transpire over the next 2,500+ years regarding Israel.   You can, in theory, question any claims this person made about his own nature and position; but you can't question the facts that are irrefutably proven regarding the knowledge possessed.